21 to 30 of 2,694 Results
Apr 27, 2026 -
Thin Populist Appeals and Democratic Backsliding Through Candidate Legitimization and Elite Delegitimization
R Syntax - 63.0 KB -
MD5: 0c2567b24d23650bd9e4216a92b1bf26
T-tests for Study Four; ISPS number D228F10; Published 4/23/2026; Source: Authors; Created with: R |
Apr 27, 2026 -
Thin Populist Appeals and Democratic Backsliding Through Candidate Legitimization and Elite Delegitimization
Gzip Archive - 11.9 KB -
MD5: 1e09741aa8406fa574179de70509c87a
College_Debt_Data; ISPS number D228F03; Published 4/23/2026; Source: Authors; Created with: R |
Apr 27, 2026 -
Thin Populist Appeals and Democratic Backsliding Through Candidate Legitimization and Elite Delegitimization
Tabular Data - 40.2 KB - 15 Variables, 615 Observations - UNF:6:gE2ksswdphpiV6Csfr8VxA==
Coronavirus_Data; ISPS number D228F02; Published 4/23/2026; Source: Authors; Created with: R |
Apr 27, 2026 -
Thin Populist Appeals and Democratic Backsliding Through Candidate Legitimization and Elite Delegitimization
Adobe PDF - 41.1 KB -
MD5: f2425ef79de9eed6265ef14d15c114b7
Curator README; ISPS number D228F23; Published 4/23/2026; Source: ISPS; Created with: R version 4.5.1 |
Apr 27, 2026 -
Thin Populist Appeals and Democratic Backsliding Through Candidate Legitimization and Elite Delegitimization
Tabular Data - 228.5 KB - 38 Variables, 1456 Observations - UNF:6:qWgoKR3Tb6Vg6/wXQaZxVQ==
Filibuster_Data; ISPS number D228F04; Published 4/23/2026; Source: Authors; Created with: R |
Apr 27, 2026 -
Thin Populist Appeals and Democratic Backsliding Through Candidate Legitimization and Elite Delegitimization
Tabular Data - 157.7 KB - 31 Variables, 1001 Observations - UNF:6:NVtrsQ9c3DxxSs9vB9WMtg==
Vote_Data; ISPS number D228F05; Published 4/23/2026; Source: Authors; Created with: R |
Apr 27, 2026
Alexander Love, 2026, "Hearing, Not Heeding: Procedural Acknowledgment and Substantive Influence in Rulemaking", https://doi.org/10.60600/YU/MQLCRW, Yale Dataverse, V1
Public participation processes promise that citizens will be heard, but rarely guarantee they will be heeded. This distinction between procedural acknowledgment and substantive influence lies at the heart of bureaucratic responsiveness, yet these two forms of responsiveness are often conflated in empirical research. I demonstrate that in federal ru... |
Apr 27, 2026 -
Hearing, Not Heeding: Procedural Acknowledgment and Substantive Influence in Rulemaking
Plain Text - 676 B -
MD5: 68d2eaf49476be319e6c051885878ff1
Curator README; ISPS number D231F04; Published 4/22/2026; Source: ISPS; Created with: Text editor |
Apr 27, 2026 -
Hearing, Not Heeding: Procedural Acknowledgment and Substantive Influence in Rulemaking
Gzip Archive - 80.8 MB -
MD5: fad3b2e2e8b6dc051b9c749e7fd0b076
Input data; ISPS number D231F02; Published 4/22/2026; Source: Authors; Created with: R R for Windows 4.5.2 |
Apr 27, 2026 -
Hearing, Not Heeding: Procedural Acknowledgment and Substantive Influence in Rulemaking
R Notebook - 11.9 KB -
MD5: 9aa3eb64f83d7b5bc64dff8f8e395023
Replication code; ISPS number D231F03; Published 4/22/2026; Source: Authors; Created with: R R for Windows 4.5.2 |
